Thoughts on economics and liberty

My slightly shifting position on Narendra Modi

I've been very sceptical about Modi for a very long time, as readers would know.

My case against him is mainly the following:

1) Potentially a murderer/ abettor in killings

Despite the fact that courts have to date not found direct connivance of Modi in the ghastly events of 2002, I'm aware of very significant discrepancies including the murder of his Minister and key witnesses, and reported destruction of key documents/evidence. His treatment of the wife of his Home minister also raises too many questions.

The facts don't add up, but I simply don't have time to investigate (unlike the global warming issue in which I spent a huge amount of time to study the facts).

I've therefore got to take the only logical position in such a case – that Modi might be innocent. If he is innocent, then he is grossly incompetent in his inability to clamp down and prevent riots (such incompetence is not borne out by other facts). Therefore this puzzle about why dead bodies were paraded in the streets, why police was not immediately sent to Gulbarg Society, will remain.

I only hope that the law will ultimately take its own course. I'm not going to be able to find the time to study the matter carefully – as I'd have preferred to. I had started some initial documentation here. And also a little website to classify the data, but no time to pursue it yet.

2) Opponent of free speech

Modi banned a book. That's totally unacceptable. Let all people say whatever they like (so long as they are not directly threatening violence). Freedom of speech is a fundamental requirement. Let there be debate/discussion and research. Let people find out the truth themselves.

3) Racist

Modi has used strongly racist language. If he had objection to foreigners, he could have said so. After all, Africans are foreigners, too. And Asians. But he said "goras" which refers to Westerners. 

"Now onwards pen, pencils, notebooks would not be sold by your neighbourhood shopkeeper but some 'gora' (WHITE). So, local traders and retailers will lose employment," Modi said here while addressing a large gathering at Vivekananda Youth Convention here in Kutch district.

"Former US President Abraham Lincoln gave world famous definition of democracy – 'of the people, by the people and for the people'–, but our Manmohan Singhji has given us a new definition – 'of the foreigners, by the foreigners, for the foreigners'," he said. [Source]

Modi sent a delegation to Melbourne a few years ago (I attended their event) to ask Australians for investment in Gujarat. Why would invest in Gujarat/India if such a blatantly racist person is its chief?

4) Anti-Muslim

Modi has made some pretty bad statements against Muslims.

5) Unable to stop corruption

It is evident that corruption in Gujarat has not stopped. It has possibly reduced slightly, but by no means has it come to an end. Also, Transparency international's study on corruption across Indian states found that Gujarat is as corrupt as most other states.

6) No interest in systemic reforms

Although Modi has started using the mantra: Less government, more governance, it is not the kind of systemic reform mantra that I've been talking about. He has not suggested a revamp of the Indian administrative system,  he has not suggested basic principles and policy frameworks on the basis of which good policy can be derived.

Singapore, S.Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand, even China, have been adopting SYSTEMIC reforms. But Modi neither knows about them nor has ever mentioned them. Therefore his knowledge base is insufficient to lead India.

So what's made me rethink my position?

I've generally held (except when I'm truly angry with Modi's actions) that Modi is better than Rahul Gandhi. That's a no brainer. Congress has got nothing in its favour. It only displays incompetence and corruption. And it has been involved in innumerable communal riots of greater magnitude than those in Modi's Gujarat.

I'm also recently informed that Madhu Kishwar has changed her position re: Modi. She is a person whose judgement I greatly respect. (I've not yet read her article – just too busy to do that).

I am unable to sweep away my doubts and concerns. Too many of them.

His character seems to be deeply illiberal and bigoted. His personality, reported by many people, is domineering and dictatorial.

However, he is the only major politician in India whose economic policy approach is broadly compatible with mine. (True, JP of Lok Satta and Sharad Joshi of SBP/ Shetkari Sangathan better understand the concept of liberty).

Tentative conclusion/ approach

Swami Ramdev has been constantly saying that: "Narendra Modi appears as a man who is committed to development and one who can prevent corruption". [Source].

Now I respect Swami Ramdev as a man of great integrity. He is also clear that we must attack the biggest evil first: Congress.

The Congress party is, in my view, the GREATEST ENEMY of India. It has betrayed India repeatedly, it has harmed India in every possible way. It is a fiefdom of a family where entry to the top is PERMANENTLY BLOCKED. It doesn't matter if you are half-Italian. It does matter that you are remotely connected to Nehru – the good man who ruined India through bad policy.

So I'm willing to live with Swami Ramdev's assessment and give Modi the benefit of doubt.

Does it mean that my doubts have eased? No. Not at all. I'd still like to get answers to my questions. I'd still like Modi to do the right thing and not block liberty in India, not be a bigoted racist, be more focused on system reform to reduce corruption, etc. But I'm willing to broadly support Modi on the assumption that law will take its own course, and that he might change/evolve into a less bigoted character in the coming months.

If he is willing to listen to honest advice and feedback, he could be good for an India that is looking to PERMANENTLY move away from Congress.

I'd like the Congress to permanently be disbanded. It has become a den of thieves and criminals. While BJP is not a group of saints, Congress is clearly the worst of the lot.

This changed position doesn't mean I support BJP, It doesn't mean I am willing to work with Modi blindly. But I'm wiling to give him the benefit of doubt if he does the right thing from now on (even as the law takes its own course).

And what's the right thing that Modi should do?

– That he support the draft vision and agenda for change that was broadly agreed at the National Reform Summit recently. That he focus on SYSTEM CHANGE. That he focus on underlying governance reforms.

But at all times we must hold Modi and BJP to account. And we must offer India a MUCH better alternative.

I call upon India's young blood like Shantanu Bhagwat to step forward and lead India. We need new, clean, honest, competent and knowledgeable leadership that will protect India's national interest.

All such good people can join SKC Federation. Even good people (if any!) from Congress/BJP can join SKC Federation if they agree to the vision/agenda for change that is being offered.

The SKC Federation is the starting point of a journey that will deliver India PERMANENTLY to an era of integrity and good governance.

Let's make India a POWERFUL Sone Ki Chidiya once again. Both Congress and BJP have failed. Let all good people assemble under one banner – of liberty, prosperity, and INTEGRITY.

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

Sanjeev Sabhlok

View more posts from this author
6 thoughts on “My slightly shifting position on Narendra Modi
  1. AD

    Excellent decision sir. But you should change your stance NOT based on Madhu ji’s testimony but on his track record for development.

    He has got a stellar track record when it comes to ‘serving the public’ and provide good governance. I am a supporter of Kejriwal and will be voting for AAP, but I cannot help but marvel at the work Modi has done. And being a fan of Modi is not easy, mind you – with the radioactiveness & untouchability Modi has in India – you INSTANTLY get branded a sanghi & get attacked when you praise Modi. Loose all credibility. People unfollow you on twitter.

    Add to that ‘Modinama’ by Madhu Kishwar ji also reveals some absolutely astounding facts. Modi is nowhere nearly as culpable/guilty as he is made out to be. Yes, many questions still remain – but Madhu ji has promised to answer a lot many of them in the follow-up pieces in her Modinama series.

    Modi understands better than anybody, the need to promote business:
    – He has gotten rid of a lot of beaurocracy & red-tape and made it easier to do business. Has a single-window clearence for all businesses (no more 40 forms to start a restaurant)
    – Has surplus power in his state (in fact center is stopping him from selling 3000 MWs of extra power he has to other states. I believe this is CRIMINAL – when there are businesses which are down because of lack of power. In their intolerance for Modi, Congress is making people suffer & hampering growth. Something absolutely unpardonable)
    – Focussing on skill-development of youth for various jobs in a big way
    – Has industrial zones where the living standards, conditions of workers & infrastructure are v good
    – Is EXTREMELY pro-active in attracting business. His Global Summits have been extremely successful
    – He (or somebody I have heard) claims, 75% of the new jobs created in India were from Gujarat
    – Has improved governance to get better tax collection

    And he agrees with your ideas of liberalism too – advocates ‘Minimum government, maximum governance’ & says ‘Govt has no business to do business’ (one of the few Indian politicians who says these things)

    You MUUUST see a couple of his recent speeches – to get an idea of how much work he has done, his vision, the results of his work etc. He is the real deal…

  2. ayush

    Dear Sir,

    I find it quite strange that you didnt find 15 minutes time to read Madhu Kishwar's 3 article's on Modi and that too when you claim to be reconsidering your position on Modi.

    This sounds like a dishonest assertion, would appreciate if you could clarify.




  3. Sanjeev Sabhlok

    Madhu doesn’t quite know what is expected of a government in communal riot situations. Doubts about Modi can’t be cleared by reading Madhu.

    Regardless of Modi, BJP is a corrupt and criminal outfit, and I do NOT support BJP. Can collaborate with Modi for strategic purposes, but will never directly support such a corrupt socialist outfit as BJP.


  4. sanghi

    oh if bjp is a corrupt outfit who is not: congress or left? left has conducted mass murders in the name of its ideology. supreme court had to explicitly give a judgement on account of left's frequent bandhs and murders occurring in them in kerala. not a single party in india is devoid of communal riots in its tenure. congress has got the most. and it has bought most of the intellectual class with whatever price they demand to defame modi. its a shame that being pro hindu is untouchable in india being pro christian is not so in USA. what pseudo modernism is this? obama was forced to declare that he is a christian. being proud of one's religion is not wrong. i chose the name deliberately reading one of the comments in this page. and i am a proud supporter of bjp, im pro hindutva and that doesnt make me communal. because being pro hindutva doesnt mean being anti any other belief. may be the so called intellectuals of india should open up their minds

  5. Sanjeev Sabhlok

    You are welcome to be a Hindu. That’s not the issue re: BJP/Modi. Hindus vote for all kinds of parties. In fact more than 50 per cent of India votes for NEITHER congress nor bjp.

    The issue is severe corruption in BJP.

    I am saying we should support Modi to the extent he will bring SYSTEMIC reforms that eliminate corruption and misgovernance. This is NOT about religion. It is about good governance.

    I would defintely ask everyone to totally boycott Congress.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial