Thoughts on economics and liberty

Category: Bad ideas!

Fascism and communism/socialism are woven from the same thread

I’ve explained this many times earlier, e.g.

Hitler’s socialist views were exactly like Nehru’s or AAP’s Prashant Bhushan’s

Further proof that Hitler was socialist.

More on Hitler’s socialist (collectivist) worldview

Why did Hitler hate communism? Because he was a GREATER communist than the communists.

Mussolini made as clear as humanly possible:
https://twitter.com/sabhlok/status/1637344140328603649

 

Further, Peter Hitchens has been waging a war against those who falsely classify fasicsm as an ideology of the “right”, e.g.

 

 

 

Continue Reading

In 1802, the Annals of Medicine reported the vast exaggerations re: influenza

Jason Gavrilis has located this wonderfully old but evocative piece: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5110691/pdf/annmededinb75123-0488.pdf

I’ve cleaned out the Old English spellings for the first few paras and have annotated in colour.

We can CLEARLY recognise the echoes of covid hysteria in this!

===

ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 1802.    

Since the publication of our last volume, no disease has claimed more attention from medical practitioners than the Influenza, which has raged very generally in many different parts of Europe, but particularly in Paris, in London, and in Edinburgh. We need hardly mention, that in newspaper paragraphs, and in vague conversations, many groundless and absurd stories have been circulated respecting it. Thus, among other particulars, it has been currently reported, that in the city of Edinburgh in one day, about the beginning of April, no less than an hundred patients were buried, all of whom died of the influenza; and that in one day about the end of March, one gentleman, in extensive practice, had been called to no less than one thousand patients labouring under this disease. But although our readers will readily conclude, that in these reports there has been a wonderful degree of exaggeration, and we can assure them from good authority, that, the present period, the greatest number of deaths from all diseases put together in Edinburgh, has never exceeded a hundred in any one week; yet it is an undoubted fact, that since the beginning of March, the influenza has been both a frequent and sometimes a fatal disease in Edinburgh.

But if exaggerated accounts have been given respecting the frequency and fatality of this complaint, no less groundless and wonderful stories have been propagated by ignorant or designing men respecting its nature and peculiarities. It has been represented by some, who ought to know better, as a new and most tremendous disease, which, unless happily remedied by a peculiar mode of treatment, will prove certainly fatal. But we need not observe to the candid reader, that such reports have no other foundation but the weakest credulity, or the lowest artifice.

The Influenza, as it has appeared in Edinburgh, in 1803, is precisely the same disease which has extended itself at different periods for near a thousand years past over almost the whole of Europe. We may refer those who wish for the most particular account of the authors who have described it, as appearing at different periods, to the Nosologia Methodica of Dr Cullen, under the genus Catarrhus. But we shall here present our readers with a short view of these Authors, in chronological order, as giving descriptions of different epidemics.

And so on…

Continue Reading

Fauci the Lying King

Anthony Fauci is a legendary liar. (Don’t miss these memes)

SCOTT ATLAS IN HIS BOOK, A PLAGUE UPON OUR HOUSE

It’s also worth noting the very relevant history of Dr. Fauci in regard to AIDS. He created headlines in New York Times, UPI, and AP articles for his alarmist speculations in his 1983 JAMA editorial that AIDS could be transmitted by “routine close contact, as within a family household.” It had already been known that transmission was via fluids through blood or sexual contact. Less than two months later, on June 26 in the Baltimore Sun, Fauci publicly contradicted his own explosive claim. “It is absolutely preposterous to suggest that AIDS can be contracted through normal social contact like being in the same room with someone or sitting on a bus with them. The poor gays have received a very raw deal on this.” That seemed like quite a flip-flop, with no new evidence or explanation given—more reminiscent of a politician than a reliable scientist.

PERPLEXITY

https://www.perplexity.ai/?s=u&uuid=35da6bc8-d47e-42ce-9687-ea1e3bbe1189

VIDEOS ON TWITTER

 

 

Continue Reading

Susan Michie the communist “public health expert”

Susan Michie says:

“If you look at the publications coming out from the behavioural group of SAGE, many, many of them talk about the problems of inequality in our society, and the dangers of inequalities, the fact that the pandemic itself and the response have increased those inequalities and the need to reduce inequalities. And there’s a large group — we call it SPI-B — on the Behavioural Science Group. And we never talk about each other’s politics. I assume there’s a very broad range, but everybody’s unanimous about wanting a more equal society.

“And in order to get a fairer and more just society, it does require the government that’s been elected to have policies that reduce rather than increase inequalities. Just to be clear, I wasn’t trying to embarrass you or make it a personal point. It’s just, we’re in a strange world where politics and science have got very close all of a sudden, and I wonder, do you regret that, do you wish that – I think there is a sort of ideological difference, I suppose, with public health science, taking a more population-wide view of things: how do we deal with this across the population? How do we deal with this as a society? How do we make things less unequal and fairer, and that is a different kind of emphasis coming from public health, population health science, to what I don’t see a lot of amongst my colleagues maybe, but certainly the media, and especially the papers that you mentioned, would have much more emphasis on individual freedom, individual rights, rather than taking a sort of more collective population approach.

“But the reality is, that this pandemic has shown everybody that no individual is an island. We’re very interconnected. And no one community or no one socio-economic group within society can think that they can solve it for themselves and protect themselves, because it’s not like that.”

She says, “What I don’t see a lot of amongst my colleagues, is much more emphasis on individual freedom, individual rights, overtaking a sort of more collective population approach.”

Continue Reading