Studies regarding the unreliability of PCR tests

The usual placeholder post that will update – to track various studies/ reports.

Important: Portuguese Court’s ruling against improper use of PCR tests.

The Ct value is inversely related to the viral load and every ~3.3 increase in the Ct value reflects a 10-fold reduction in starting material. Many qPCR assays involve a Ct cutoff of 40 to consider the test positive, allowing detection of very few starting RNA molecules. [Source]

Watch the following video from 2:50

In Australia, Doherty Institute recommended 38CT or morehttps://t.co/HSwjfJJOKq pic.twitter.com/UEHWvOcHQN

— ‾|‾hεο IFR 0.13% #FreeAssange 🍀🎗 (@Cyph3rDe) November 16, 2020

Extracts from Virus Mania by Torsten Engelbrecht

2/ Three more extracts re: PCR – including the failure to isolate SARS (the virus that then mysteriously disappeared). pic.twitter.com/35W5ltkPzh

— Sanjeev Sabhlok, Pope @Church of Reason & Liberty (@sabhlok) November 17, 2020

https://twitter.com/sabhlok/status/1328647671217672192

@sabhlok https://t.co/vP5dfyArtQ

— Simon Begg (@SimonLB67) November 1, 2020

One of the key scientists involved in PCR tests expresses his shock at its misuse.

PUBLIC HEALTH TERRORISM KNOWS NOW BOUNDS: violation of ethics, laws, and falsification of data and tests.

Read the full thread.https://t.co/MUO2T26Qo6 pic.twitter.com/ad04EbRW5T

— Sanjeev Sabhlok, Pope @Church of Reason & Liberty (@sabhlok) October 26, 2020

ADDENDUM 21 OCTOBER 2020

Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose

Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2020-10-20. 40-80% T-cell cross-reactivity. Test Fraud testimony. ONS fig don’t show crisis

@sabhlok The PT-PCR test shouldn't be used as a tool to determine pandemic responses now we have so much data. pic.twitter.com/HbC1Grvzdb

— Melissa Murphy-Web (@melissaemw) October 21, 2020

ADDENDUM 18 OCTOBER 2020

Email re: BOGUS PCR tests – I think there is much merit in such claims. Will Dr Trevor Douglas and CSIRO speak up?

There’s a lot of detail here: Reiner Fuellmich’s video about COVID crimes against humanity – he’s on the right track but has missed out many things

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless

Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?

This is on our governments website.
“The reliability of COVID-19 tests is uncertain due to the limited evidence base. Available evidence mainly comes from symptomatic patients, and their clinical role in detecting asymptomatic carriers is unclear.”https://t.co/1fecqbIo3c

— Tom (@TheWarCOVID1984) October 11, 2020

pic.twitter.com/I843YzJ1fX

— CJ (@truthmeupplz) October 11, 2020

Do those people who wish to destroy freedom and democracy in Victoria understand the impact of false positives? https://t.co/ristrVfJmL

— Miss Conceptions (@MConceptions) October 10, 2020

1/x ⬆️ Testing = ⬆️ Cases

This ALSO:

(1) ⬆️ #False_Positive PCR results (compared to True Positives)
especially if ⬆️ #asymptomatics tested

&

(2) #NON_infectious cases IF excess Ct cutoff

Leads to #erroneous reporting of #NON_Infectious #Cases

REF
1) https://t.co/3lgIgCEsqa

— Sabina Walker, Master Appl Science (Neuroscience) (@SabinaWalker18) September 27, 2020

Kary Mullis Invented PCR

He won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his invention

PCR is being used to test for COVID

What would Mullis say about this?

We will never know, Mullis passed away just weeks before the outbreak began

But we have a good idea.. pic.twitter.com/pzUrp2YmDy

— Tickety-boo (@Tickety05965929) October 17, 2020