Thoughts on economics and liberty

Studies regarding the unreliability of PCR tests

The usual placeholder post that will update – to track various studies/ reports.

Important: Portuguese Court’s ruling against improper use of PCR tests.

The Ct value is inversely related to the viral load and every ~3.3 increase in the Ct value reflects a 10-fold reduction in starting material. Many qPCR assays involve a Ct cutoff of 40 to consider the test positive, allowing detection of very few starting RNA molecules. [Source]

Watch the following video from 2:50


Extracts from Virus Mania by Torsten Engelbrecht






Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose

Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2020-10-20. 40-80% T-cell cross-reactivity. Test Fraud testimony. ONS fig don’t show crisis



Email re: BOGUS PCR tests – I think there is much merit in such claims. Will Dr Trevor Douglas and CSIRO speak up?

There’s a lot of detail here: Reiner Fuellmich’s video about COVID crimes against humanity – he’s on the right track but has missed out many things

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless

Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?






Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

Sanjeev Sabhlok

View more posts from this author
Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial