Thoughts on economics and liberty

Category: Freedom Team

The challenge of building a national liberal political alternative

This article was published in the November 2009 (Volume 3, 2009) issue, South Asia eNewsletter of FNF.

===

Indian political liberalism has been blossoming in the last few years but is still very fragile. The demand for freedom is still largely confined to the fringe of Indias mainstream political debates. The mantra of socialism refuses to die out despite the success of economic liberalisation. Indeed, Indias politicians continue to preach socialism as they practice their ugly mix of statism, crony capitalism and corruption.

The idea of freedom as the most basic political good is still struggling for relevance in a nation where over six decades socialism has created a strong culture of relying on the government for everything. And there has been very poor communication. As a result most Indians simply dont understand what freedom means, mixing it with democracy or even independence.

Freedom never came in a silver platter. It has had to be fought for and won. By each generation.
Today it is our turn, and we must give battle to socialism and corruption irrespective of whether we win or lose. Sadly, Indian liberals have not recovered from the demise of the Swatantra Party in 1974. They are fragmented and seemingly incapable of combining together to lead India to freedom.
But there are good tidings. It is possible, even likely, that a national liberal political front will take shape in India in the next few years. Let me tell you about this good news.

My lost decade
At this stage I need to introduce myself briefly to you. I worked as an Indian bureaucrat from 1982 to January 2001. I now do similar things in Australia. Like most Indians of my generation who were encouraged to take up science and technology in their school days at the expense of the liberal arts, I had only a feeble understanding of economics, political science or political philosophy when I joined the Indian civil service. I therefore assumed that (the socialist) policies set by the government were well researched.

But dissonance soon arose. For if these policies were so good why was there so much corruption, inefficiency and waste? Public money was being destroyed and entrepreneurship choked. There was a great disconnect between highly talented bureaucrats on the one hand and pathetic results on the other.

Therefore, from 1984 to 1999 I studied economics and management and sought answers to this riddle. In 1998, at age 38, while completing my PhD, the haze finally cleared. When it did, it became also clear to me that the required reforms must start from the top. A political mandate was needed. Another thing became clear: that we need to stop pointing fingers at others and take responsibility for our country. We must become the leaders we want to see.

The Swatantra Party had died without a trace, and it was not possible to join existing corrupt or communal political parties. So I determined to establish a liberal political party, knowing very well the challenges involved. Between 1998 and 2000 I met many Indians across the world to advance the idea of a liberal political movement. Most people I met were cynical, without much hope. But I kept trying.

During this process many shortcomings of Indians became clear our lack of leaders (or rather, the lack of citizenship); and among the few leaders we have, the lack of strategic thinking. No Rajaji did I find. I also found that our industrialists and businessman live solely for themselves. They are happy to bribe their way though the corrupt system. The country means absolutely nothing to them. No JRD Tata did I come across.

And failure dogged my steps. Finally, after three failed attempts, not yet being a persistent leader, I grew disheartened and gave up. That was mid-2005.

Freedom Team of India
But by December 2007 I was back in business, with a totally different approach. What happened?

As I worked within the government machinery while living in Melbourne, it was impossible not to think of India and its colossal waste of human resources. I learnt how an effective governance system looks like and wanted to transmit this learning to India. So I kept writing the book I had started in 2005. This book, Breaking Free of Nehru (published by Anthem Press in 2008 and now available as a free e-book at http://bfn.sabhlokcity.com/), is more a political pamphlet than a book.

In it, after much reflection, I proposed the concept of a Freedom Team of India (FTI).

The idea behind the Team is simple. It aims to bring together at least 1500 outstanding liberal leaders who are willing in-principle to contest elections. After policy agreements are achieved, such a team could give serious battle at the hustling to corrupt socialist forces and ultimately deliver freedom and good governance to India.

Started as an electronic group in December 2007, FTI it has now begun to take serious shape. In July 2009 FTI (http://freedomteam.in/) was registered as a not-for-profit organisation.

FTI has placed itself squarely in the classical liberal mould, steering away from conceptions of social democracy or libertarianism. Over 80 excellent leaders have joined so far, although not all may contest elections in the end.

One thing that distinguishes FTI from efforts like Lok Satta or Jago Party is this, that it will not launch a political movement until all ingredients are in place. That includes leaders, agreed policies, funds, and local supporters. There is little point in making a Quixotian assault against misgovernance by trying to win a handful of seats. There must either be a full-fledged national alternative, or nothing.

Given the great importance of building a support base, FTI has floated the concept of Adharshila of liberal groups across India to take the liberal message to the people and undertake a wide range of activities.

I believe that the strategy chosen by the Team offers a real chance to change the corrupt Indian political landscape. The good news is that those who have joined the team so far are truly excellent people. I am gaining confidence by the day about the possibility that India will finally get its national liberal political party in the coming years.

Of course, this is a herculean challenge and FTI needs all the support it can get. It needs serious commitment from all Indian liberals. You can either join as a leader or help find someone to join it. If you cant do either, then please support it in some other form or shape. If you have any questions please write to me sabhlok AT yahoo DOT com.

I look forward to your interest. In conclusion I would also like to invite you to read my draft manuscript entitled, The Discovery of Freedom, at http://discovery.sabhlokcity.com/. This book, when finished, will complement Breaking Free of Nehru.

Continue Reading

A note on the outreach effort of FTI in Indore

The Freedom Team of India has come of age. It was officially born as a legal entity on 1 July.

More importantly, its first outreach effort in Indore has shown real promise, much to do with the outstanding organisation by L.K. Kandpal and Ajay Anand, as well as leadership by Shantanu Bhagwat. Three other FTI members helped/participated, as well.

Reports on the Indore outreach effort will be provided in the next issue of Towards a Great India (expected to be released tomorrow). But I thought it worthwhile today to guide visitors to this blog to the following page: http://freedomteam.in/outreach-indore-09. Visit it! You'll be impressed.

A strong beginning for something that has essentially started in cyberspace. The search for outstanding leaders in India is now on in real earnest.

Regards
Sanjeev

Continue Reading

When will I enter full-time politics in India?

(This post is work in progress). A member on FTI asked me about my political plans for India. This is the current situation.

Joint responsiblity
I have wanted to be in full time politics since 1998, but various constraints have prevented it. My family commitments must get first priority. The reform of India is a task for all of us – indeed, of all citizens – not mine alone by any means.

I do expect to come back when financially not significantly worse off (not just for one year or two, but for my entire life). Sharad Joshi gets a substantial UN pension for life – that has left him free to do politics full-time upon his return from Geneva. Therefore he is the only full-time Indian liberal politican today. I am not so blessed, and my attempts to seek funding so far have failed, though I remain hopeful

For instance, I had offered to work in 2000 with CCS for life for a relatively small amount – only $20K US per year indexed for life – but that was too high for CCS to afford at that stage. Now my financial situation is far more complex, and the amount needed to get me to India full-time may exceed $150K AUD pre-tax to pay my mortgage, etc. The fact that I didn’t stay on in India in 2000 has turned out be a good outcome. It forced me to gain experience in a developed country bureaucracy – and also forced me (as I started writing my book/s) to think more clearly about what I stood for. The importance of leadership became clearer to me thorugh experiences in Australia. These things wouldn’t have happened if I had continued in India as part of CCS.

In addition, I’ve been looking for appropriate jobs over the past 3 years that will take me to India but have not been successful on that front yet. If nothing comes up I expect to be able to return in 10 1/2 years at age 60 when I will get an old-age pension in Australia (provided I continue my citizenship) which will mean I could retire from work here and work in India with fewer financial constraints – but that will also mean I won’t be able to contest elections. Delaying for 10 1/2 years is not my preference.

One possibility is that once 1500 members join FTI, there will be sufficient momentum and funding for people like me who want to return and work for FTI and politics full time. Currently, working as a ‘full-time’ second, unpaid job is all I can afford.

Btw, I am aware that similar constraints may apply to a number of others on FTI as well. One thing I don’t want is for any of us to reduce focus on our primary responsiblity – towards our families – for the sake of our secondary (joint) responsibility (country). The liberal must know his priorities. No one is better placed to look after our families than us. If I hear of any liberal who has acted irresponsibly towards his family (and I’m guilty of that at least in part in terms of time I devote), I’d know the liberal has some work cut out for him.

Continue Reading

Proposed leadership aspirations for the Freedom Team of India

(DRAFT IN PROGRESS)

This is a leadership aspirations proposal for FTI to consider. I'm drafting it directly on the internet, using my blog as a wiki tool – I will continually change the content till I get it 'right'. Please provide feedback to help achieve a sensible (ambitious, realistic, doable) aspiration for FTI (Sanjeev, 28 January 2009).

If FTI is to guarantee the quality of leaders it offers to the people of India, we must all become good leaders, and that includes being team players. Our personal failures to improve our leadership skills and work as a team can cost millions of lives in the future. On the other hand, with good leadership (the 'servant leadership' concept comes to mind), we can deliver the world to India today and in the future.

The kind of leader FTI is looking for is an ordinary, SOVEREIGN, citizen-leader who refuses to 'kow-tow' towards anyone within our outside FTI or any other organisation. Equally, team member must be committed to working collaboratively with others to achieve the society he/she wants.

The team has set itself ambitious goals for personal leadership development. When we learn karate, we must ultimately aim to become 9 Dan masters, or as in Richard Bach’s ‘Jonathan Livingston Seagull’ – enter a realm of consciousness where we see the world from a 'higher' perspective (say, of 50,000 years) but deal with all the necessary detail today, to make that outcome, 50,000 years later, happen.

Level 4 or 5 leadership (cf. Jim Collins)
Similarly, FTI members could aim for level 5 leadership (just a concept, without getting too bogged down by what it means) in the end. In particular, hubris or arrogance comes naturally to all of us – humans that we are – so we need to doubly ensure we keep ourselves really low on the ground at all times! [I found these slides (650KB) on the internet and have kept them on my website – I acknowledge the author of these slides though I don't know the person!]

But level 5 is virtually impossible for most of us, requiring a level of self-awareness, self-control, calmness, critical thinking, sharp memory, and knowledge that we could barely hope to achieve without lifelong practice. Level 4 leadership is therefore an excellent intermediate step to aim, for most of us. Out of that may arise level 5 leadership. That will mean contributing to the success of India (not the team alone, which is only an instrument of that goal) as best as we can, without holding any expectations from anyone but ourselves alone, or even any expectation of success. As Newt Gingrich calls it in his book, 'Real Change', it is all about being citizen leaders and doing the right thing with 'cheerful persistence'. This is in keeping with many other wise teachings of a similar sort, like that of Krishna in the Gita, that doing the right thing is its own reward.

Flowing on from this team leader concept, we don't need any one or more leaders. Except for one occasion (1921) when Gandhi (a level 5 leader by most accounts) was the President of Indian Congress Congress he wasn't interested in nor bothered about these ceremonious roles. Yet, the Congress was almost entirely guided by his views for another 25 years. Similarly, when India became independent, he moved back into private citizenship for the most part, but remained a critical voice in India because of his moral leadership. Gandhi's example tells us a few things which we can seek to imbibe (without justifying everything Gandhi did or said)

a) Sincerity (do what you ask others to do)

b) Humility (never impose; be willing to listen)

c) Moral and philosophical leadership (elaborate on the bigger goals for each citizen and the world; aim not for a petty position for oneself, even the position of Prime Minister of India)

One of the great shortcomings of Gandhi was his failure to develop leaders. We can overcome this problem by ensuring a culture which generates leaders.

An organisational culture for FTI to aim for

"Organisation-free" organisation
We want a culture of equal independence and joint commitment to our common causes than a culture rather that values hierarchy in any way. We are goal focused, not title-focused. Therefore, FTI is a team of equals without (at least currently) any 'core group' or 'secretaries' or 'president'. Yes, we need a Trust to help us manage funds properly, and we can have 'office secretaries' and the like to keep things clean and tidy, but we don't need any Presidents, Secretaries, and such high-flown designations on FTI.

Why so?

a) We are equals
FTI is a flat 'pyramid' with no 'pointy top' of a single leader. We are all citizen-leaders and team players. Everyone on FTI is a citizen-leader. Hence we don't need a single leader (or a 'core group' of leaders).

b) Leadership challenge and development
FTI is all about leadership development. Each FTI member should – on his/her own – be sufficient to transform India. As Guru Gobind Singh said of the Sikhs he was prepating to be leaders – "Sava lakh se ek ladaun". Even one Gandhi is enough. We are asking for at least 1500 Gandhis, so India never has to be short of good leaders again.

c) We can contribute wherever we contribute best without formal titles
Members could aim to work as a team (each with their own independent opinions, which are always welcome) and take the lead on projects where they can contribute most. Of course, we can choose to play different roles (and hence exercise different levels of influence through persuasion). We can select/elect 'team leaders' for various teams or tasks, or (better still) nominate ourselves as 'team leaders' by volunteering to lead certan tasks. But we don't want (for the most part) any official designations and 'organsational structures'.

Similarly, local groups at constituency level we will need to help mobilise support. These groups (and should) function as enirely non-hierarchical 'families' and 'teams', not as formal bodies. We are friends working together, not 'high command' vs. the 'ordinary member'. All citizen-leaders.

Thus FTI aims to be an "organisation-free" organisation that requires high levels of commitment, understanding and a minimal ego on the part of each of the "team/family" members.

d) Formal roles can aggravate competitions and caus neeless conflict
Having 'offices' is also divisive, at least until the organisation is deeply bedded down in a culture of freedom and democracy. These 'offices' often distract from the main purpose and become a source of conflict. We should aim to avoid them until we have 1500 genuine (at least level 3 or 4) leaders with us. The public wants results, and doesn't want anyone fighting over utterly useless 'positions' which don't add any value to society.

We may ultimately have office bearers
It is not that FTI will never need 'office bearers' – in some contexts these may be relevant. When FTI really star
ts organising, some such things may be useful for as a public face. But these are indicidental, not critical to our goals. Even if FTI were to elect people to certain roles (say, a spokesperson), that would not make them anything 'above' the rest of the team. Everyone on FTI must always remain equally free, sovereign citizens.

ADDENDUM 2 OCTOBER 2009

Level 3: Good at one’s work and proficient in getting things done. Intent on short term results. People trust the leader and take him by his word. Works well as a team member and engages respectfully with others but not yet focused on developing others, the institution, or the country because limited by personal ego and over-sensitivity to other’s comments. Example: Most people on this group today (including me)

Level 4: Level 3 + able to show many people the bigger picture about India’s future and bring about a shift in perspective among many people including those on on FTI. Works as a democratic decision-builder, builds consensus, challenges people to grow out of their personal limitations while keeping them focused on the main goal. Able to generate consensus and common strategy which leads to significant achievements for India. However, intent on medium term results. Emphasis on developing leaders but not yet interested in succession planning because of limited time horizon. Example: Rajaji/Masani.

Level 5: Level 4 + able to show the world a new and more effective way of thinking, able to gain consensus across the world and deliver significant global change + focused on leadership development and succession: intent on long term results. Zero personal ego (in terms of personal aggrandisement) with 100% focus on results for India and the world. Example: Lincoln/ Gandhi (not completely level 5, though, possibly 4.5).

TRAITS OF A LEADER

Here's an attempt to point out some of the required characteristics of an FTI leader – any and every FTI member. These traits are listed in no particular order:

Self:

  • Top most priority to one's own mental and physical health, and family relationships

  • Paying significant importance to one's inner world; self-awereness. Knows that if the inner world is lost, the outer world cannot be 'conquered'.

Inner qualities

  • Strategic: always focused on the goal/ on results. Not distracted by low priority issues

  • Strong sense of proportion: never 'sweats the small stuff'

  • Optimism (including 'learned optimism)

  • Enthusiasm; confidence that one will successfully contribute.

  • Ability to overcome adversity (in all its forms), e.g. ability to lose – repeatedly – and yet maintain focus and enthusiasm

  • Ability to remain calm in otherwise stressful situations

Dealings with others

  • Lots of (infinite) patience, including ability to explain the same thing again and again and again

  • Forbearance: willingness to ignore other's minor flaws knowing that no one (including oneself) is perfect

  • Respect for others on the team (and humane behaviour towards everyone more generally).

  • No lust for 'position', i.e. ablity to work as a team member without a formal role

  • Aware: sensitive to others' perceptions

  • Pleasant; delightful: never throws his weight around

  • Excellent communicator: both written and verbal

  • Values driven: truthful: doesn't hesitate from speaking the truth (subject to a sense of discretion; and of time and place)

Knowledge:

  • Critical thinking: constant application of the rational mind; constantly asking questionsExtensive reading and knowledge (knowing that knowledge is never enough)

  • Humility to know that no one knows or can know everything

  • Learner: Committed to life long learning.

Continue Reading