29th August 2012
I've made at least two major scientific breakthroughs in my life related to human health – in the case of RSI and eyestrain. In both these, doctors ENTIRELY failed, books ENTIRELY failed, academic journals ENTIRELY failed. I found the answers through intensive thought, careful analysis, and experimentation. The typical scientific method.
My eyestrain recovery process that started a few months ago is underway. I'm still recovering. Much better but a lot of improvement yet to be achieved. I do about 1-2 hours of eye exercises each day (while walking/ in the gym/ in my bed when I wake up or before sleeping, in the bus, etc.). The range of exercises I have invented is quite vast, and maybe I'll document them later. It is one of the hardest things to stretch and exercise muscles behind the eyeball that are totally invisible and which the hand can't reach; but it can be done.
But one thing kept bothering me. Although my symptoms had felt exactly the same in both sides of the temple (deep, intense headache, pain, etc.), my left eye has taken far longer to recover.
I can't describe the sensations exactly (that will take half an hour of writing, and many paragraphs!), but basically the left eye has been more sore, more tight, more difficult to heal than the right eye.
So now I have an 80 per cent healed right eye and 50 per cent healed left eye – even though I do the same exercises for both eyes. That must have some scientific reason.
Today I thought of a possible explanation. My hypothesis was that one eye must somehow be more involved in seeing things than the other eye. Just like one arm is more active than the other.
If this hypothesis was true, it would mean that my right eye was dominant and therefore the left eye's muscles were weaker, which made it work harder to see the computer screen. [Sorry, in an earlier version of this post, posted just a few minutes earlier, I accidentally inverted the logic! This one, now, is the correct logic.]
Interesting hypothesis, but I had never come across this concept of eye dominance before.
So how about googling this! I did so, and lo and behold! I've found tens of references to eye dominance. Please check them out yourself.
Eye dominance discussions on the internet are, however, primarily related to vision problems. Nothing to do with eye strain or eyeball muscles.
Well, that means I'm now the first in the world to have a hypothesis (PLUS at least one case study to confirm it) that eye dominance is related to the way eyeball muscles work at the back of the eyes, and that the non-dominant eye is more likely to be strained through computer use.
The main thing is that now I have an added eye exercise. I can now rest the left eye for longer than the right eye (by covering it while reading the computer screen, for instance – which is precisely what I'm doing as I type this, with the left eye covered by a paper). That should make the recovery process much faster.
I'm almost certain that this discovery is valid, and this solution equally valid. But I'll let google decide. It has a way of bringing up valid results to the top of search results.
Science has now been largely democratised. More useful information regarding health matters is found on google than in any medical textbook. Patient's questions/ answers on google/ open discussions – all these have made the task of finding existing truth much easier, and also of confirming new patient-led scientific discoveries.