Thoughts on economics and liberty

Legal position regarding mandatory vaccine in Australia

Some notes:

A Summary of section 51(xxiiiA) of the Constitution and related case law surrounding the subject matter of “Forced Vaccinations”

THE HISTORY OF SECTION ~ 51(xxiiiA) ~ OF THE COMMONWEALTH CONSTITUTION ~ ‘But not so as to authorise any form of civil conscription’


Yesterday I came across the Medicare form IM011 which is an immunisation medical exemption for the Australian Immunisation register and I believe it is unconstitutional and coercive. I have attached it for your information. Only doctors can complete and submit this form.

Basically the ONLY way anyone can obtain a medical exemption is if they can prove they had an anaphylactic reaction to a vaccine and they need to provide a date.

This form completely and unilaterally overrides a doctor’s professional advice based on his or her detailed knowledge of a patient’s medical history and vulnerabilities.

This is unconscionable, especially when these vaccines are still experimental and only provisionally approved without adequate testing!

We have a PM who lies to us by telling us the vaccine is safe and that it is voluntary while telling us that soon there will be a vaccination passport where we will need to demonstrate that we have been vaxed.

You can find the Medicare Form IM011 here:

Please take the time to read this carefully because from what I can see, it will be virtually impossible for any healthy living person to get this form signed by a doctor. The only basis seems to be if you have ever experienced anaphylaxis and you have to be able to provide a date.

Reading between the lines and thinking critically, I imagine that having this form signed and submitted by a doctor will be the only possibility of having a vaccination passport with an exemption. The implementation of the vaccination passport is already well underway and without it, life will be difficult. Quite possibly, very difficult.

I understand that Bill Gates has a patent over the technology underlying the vaccination passport and that this is being rolled out worldwide extremely quickly by both governments and businesses.

I guess you are aware of

The TGA has said that we cannot be told what vaccine we are being offered or details of the ingredients, so we can’t identify the vaccine.

At the same time the immunisation handbook says: Valid consent is the voluntary agreement by an individual to a proposed procedure, which is given after sufficient, appropriate and reliable information about the procedure, including the potential risks and benefits, has been conveyed to that individual.8-12

As part of the consent procedure, people receiving vaccines and/or their parents or carers should be given sufficient information (preferably written) about the risks and benefits of each vaccine. This includes:13

  • what adverse events are possible
  • how common they are
  • what they should do about them

I’m curious to know how it is possible to give consent for something when you don’t even know what it is or what’s in it? Any ideas? How could this even be upheld in a court of law?

It seems to me that authorities are no longer concerned about the legality of their edicts, they are just imposing them for as long as they can get away with it and while everybody complies.

This makes no sense to a sensible person.

Sanjeev Sabhlok

View more posts from this author
One thought on “Legal position regarding mandatory vaccine in Australia
  1. skippy

    Hi Sanjeev
    I don’t want the vaccination on 2 grounds
    (1) not proven safe, and it appears ineffective so why would one take it for a virus that really only poses a threat to those over 80 who are in poor health ( just give us access to hydroxychloroquin and ivermectin, tell the general population to get plenty of vitamin D etc )
    (2) many vaccinations have been developed from aborted fetuses

    The shifty governments and drug companies don’t publicise how these vaccines are developedor what is in them.
    Many Catholics and other christians would not want a vaccine that has been developed from aborted fetuses.There should be grounds not only for medical exemptions but for conscientious objections.
    Some people have told me they are prepared to die a martyr rather than take a shot that is the product of research done on aborted babies.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *