Thoughts on economics and liberty

The problem with Brett Sutton, Victoria’s Chief Health Officer – 1




This is an associated post:  The problem with Brett Sutton, Victoria’s Chief Health Officer – 2



There is not a SINGLE public health measure directed by Brett Sutton over the past six months that is justified by the science.


Unverifiedfrom twitter


The problem with Brett Sutton, Victoria’s Chief Health Officer – 2

Notes for (and draft of) complaint against Daniel Andrews to the International Criminal Court

Sutton has NO qualifications or EXPERIENCE in the field of epidemiology and virology.

==original post==

I have made a number of comments/suggestions to Brett Sutton. His lack of responsiveness to my questions set me off on a publicly critical path against this Labor government in Victoria – when then meant I had to resign.

I’ll compile my tweets to Sutton separately, later (that’s why this is #1). I want to emphasise that I couldn’t care less about Sutton’s qualifications. It is what he does that matters, and that’s the real issue – but I’ll talk about that separately.


Sweden’s health and mental wellbeing has been managed by one of the world’s foremost epidemiologists. Victoria’s by a GP who believes that a sledgehammer is the best tool to kill a swarm of mosquitoes.

Not everyone might use FB, so sharing the contents of my associated link:

(by André Rodrigues)

I don’t mind Prof. Brett Sutton, Chief Health Officer. I don’t envy his current role but he’s done a lot of good work in his career, particularly in vulnerable populations. He’s got a decent amount of medical experience and expertise, and sound knowledge of communicable diseases (viruses and stuff), he’s even published on Gonorrhoea (seriously).

Most of us are aware that Prof. Brett Sutton is a General Practitioner, so he’s generally qualified to have an educated opinion on health related matters. Most of us are also aware he currently has God-like powers to impose and lift restrictions upon Victorian lives as he and his Deputy CHO see fit, in order to “suppress” (but let’s be honest “eliminate”) the dangerous virus because “to stay at low numbers you have to get to low numbers”. That’s all well and good (it’s not really but for the sake of what I am focusing on, let’s pretend it is…) but is Prof. Brett Sutton qualified to be in his role, assuming such unprecedented authority? My opinion, is a simple no. Here’s why:

Most of us are not aware that the esteemed Prof. Brett Sutton is a Public Health Masters graduate from James Cook University (#462 in QS Rankings). Brett Sutton does not have a PhD. For an academic or clinician with “an international reputation” in his field, Prof. Sutton has a relatively poor and frankly noncompetitive track record in academic circles. In the last 5 years for example, he has been the first author on only 3 research papers (one of each in the fields of Climate Change, Palliative Care and Gonorrhoea).

It is interesting that in March 2020, just prior to Lockdown 1.0, Dr. Brett Sutton was handed an Adjunct Clinical Professor appointment with the Dept. of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, by the Vice-Chancellor of Monash University, a Level E appointment (that can only be endorsed by the VC). Level E is the highest level that can be obtained; typically reserved for appointees who have “established an international reputation in the area”. Evidently, Prof. Sutton met eligibility criteria for a Level E academic appointment, without writing more than 1 research paper within the same field of research. His profile is suspiciously scarce of any details (i.e. empty).

Good timing wasn’t it. I mean, its comforting to get health advice from a Professor during a pandemic, he must know and understand things we don’t. I mean it’s not like I have a PhD in Epidemiology and Public Health…oh wait, Monash did give me one of those… where’s yours Prof. Sutton?

On a humorous note (but also an alarming one), if Prof. Brett Sutton submitted a job application for my current position, he would not meet the eligibility criteria for an interview (he would get one of those automated emails saying thank you but we had too many applications blah blah ). If Prof. Brett Sutton submitted an NHMRC, ARC or any other Federal or State level grant application as a Chief Investigator, he would not meet the eligibility criteria.

His eyes are kind of dreamy though, I’ll give him that.



Sanjeev Sabhlok

View more posts from this author
8 thoughts on “The problem with Brett Sutton, Victoria’s Chief Health Officer – 1
  1. Patrick

    FINALLY someone with some research on Dr. Sutton! I have searched and searched on the usual methods and all I managed to find was that female journos seem to think he’s quite hot. I have always wondered why this mystery man has so much power. It appears to be entirely due to cronyism. Thanks for your hard work, Sanjeev, very glad I found this blog.

  2. Grumpy

    Along with Patrick I thank you for the information. Not being a social media platform user, I would never have found this out without your help.

  3. Bill Richards

    Thank for your work, and learned insight into CHO Sutton. As ‘Grumpy’ ^ implies, information regarding this fellow is quite difficult to find and getting harder by the day.

    Between Andrews’ megalomania and allegiance to Socialism (+ ‘debts’ to various unions) and the complete unsuitability of Dr Sutton (and a few others), it is no wonder that Victoria finds itself in the situation it is.

  4. Grazza

    A thought, looking back at the 1918 Spanish Flu and noting that the authorities did not do much different from what our authorities have done this pandemic: lockdowns, masks, excessive cleanliness,… except for blood letting … would we (with or without qualifications in the area) have done any more effectively?

  5. Tabs

    You need to research more thoroughly, and understand context better.

    You have omitted his considerable epidemiology experience through his leadership level work with MSF (Medcines San Frontiers) in Afghanistan and other public health work at high level in Kenya.

    You have also failed to understand that Monash University, a part of the “G8” is in the top 50 of worldwide universities… nobody is getting a level E professorship (highest level in the Australian system) without an extensive world class record demonstrating equivalence not only to a PhD (which gets you in 3 grades lower down the scale) but equivalent to the PhD plus about 10 years of high level achievement and widespread recognition in the academic field. Suggesting they give that to just anyone is like suggesting equivalent status Times world ranked universities Carnegie Mellon, NYU, or the London School of Economics and Politics might hand them out like candy… ridiculous.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *