Thoughts on economics and liberty

Modi and Madhuri – more details of the alleged relationship. And no, this is not a father-daughter relationship.

This statement by suspended IAS officer Pradeep Sharma is from the following source. I’m sure more will come out fairly soon. This whole thing is getting quite ugly.

Note that Modi is a married man. The issue of his extra-marital alliances should be of concern, but this is much more than that: the case of misuse of the taxpayer machinery to spy on “Madhuri”. Modi may have a problematic personal life, but he has no business to use TAXPAYER FUNDS to support his private relationships.

Note that Madhuri’s father’s statement needs to be taken with a strong pinch of salt, since Madhuri is an adult and she is not necessarily expected to talk about her private affairs with her father.

THE CHIEF MINISTER’S ILLICIT LIASON WITH MS –name removed–:

It was in between 2003 to 2006 that the Petitioner, in the capacity of District Collector of Kutch, commissioned a series of projects toward the beautification of Bhuj city and overall development of Kutch district. A site was selected for developing a hill garden in 2005, for which [MADHURI] —name removed—from Bangalore was selected as the Landscape Architect. The Chief Minister, Shri Narendra Modi, visited Kutch to inaugurate the hill garden project upon its completion, and was at this time introduced to Ms. [MADHURI]–name removed—. Thereafter, Ms. —name removed— communicated to the Petitioner her decision to return to Bangalore as well as shared her ongoing interaction with the Chief Minister. The fact of the intimacy between Shri Modi and Ms.—name removed— was confirmed when the Petitioner was in close proximity of the two and overheard their conversation during one of the official functions. Subsequently, Ms. —name removed—further revealed to the Petitioner that when she called Shri Modi in his office, he would freely interrupt scheduled meetings, walking out of his office on senior officials in order to speak to her privately.

During the second week of March 2006 at approximately 5:00 PM, Ms. —name removed—called the Petitioner and conveyed that she had just landed in Ahmedabad city and was planning to visit Bhuj. Shortly thereafter, when the Petitioner attempted to telephone her, Ms. —name removed—’s cell phone was switched off and remained so for the next 48 hours. Two days later at approximately 11:00 AM, Ms. —name removed— called the Petitioner and conveyed that she was at the residence of Shri Modi, and had spent the duration of the previous two days at his residence. Subsequently, she met the Petitioner in Bhuj and described in detail her stay with Shri Modi.

Ms. —name removed—described that the next day being Holi, many people visited Shri Modi for the festival and played with colour. Shri Modi attended to them briefly and returned to his quarters. In the meantime, Ms. —name removed— had developed fever and requested a physician, but Shri Modi conveyed that calling a physician was impossible, given the peculiarity of their situation. The following morning she left for Vadodara in a car sent for by Shri Modi.

In November 2008, while the Petitioner was posted as Municipal Commissioner, Bhavnagar, Ms. —name removed—contacted the Petitioner to inform him that Shri Modi had asked her to do a project on Alang Shipyard for which she would like to come to Bhavnagar. She came to Bhavnagar and, during that time, the Petitioner observed that she was constantly in touch with Shri Modi, who was abroad and probably in South Africa. She also conveyed to the Petitioner that Shri Modi had asked her about the Petitioner and whether the Petitioner knew about her intimate relationship with Shri Modi. In one conversation, Ms. —name removed—showed the Petitioner a text message that the Chief Minister had sent to her from abroad. The Petitioner made a note of the cell phone number from which it had originated. The number was 9909923400.

It is submitted that the Petitioner had two cell phones at the time, with Nos. 99251 99799 and 98240 01729. On one of these, the Petitioner had saved the aforesaid number from which Ms. —name removed— had received personal message from Shri Modi. Once, the Petitioner accidentally dialed Shri Modi’s number, thinking that he was actually calling someone else, but the Petitioner got no reply on Shri Modi’s phone. The Petitioner realized his mistake and promptly disconnected. The Petitioner verily believes that Shri Modi must have found out the address of the holder of the SIM card from which his personal number was [accidentally] dialed, and placed it under observation either with the help of State CID (Intelligence) or illegal phone tapping methods involving the use of electronic equipment through unauthorized collaboration. Shri Modi could then have found that Ms. —name removed— was speaking to the Petitioner often over phone.

Around this time, the Petitioner received an anonymous letter conveying that a video of sexual activity between Ms. —name removed— and one person, was available on an internet website, and the letter advised the Petitioner to desist from contacting Ms. —name removed—, as her character and actions were not befitting of her company with Gujarat State officials. The Petitioner did indeed come across such a video clipping and it now appears to the Petitioner that Shri Modi, who was monitoring the Petitioner’s cell phone calls, started believing that videos involving Ms. —name removed— perhaps included him i.e. Shri Modi…”

ADDENDUM

More details of the situation.

Since these documents keep disappearing from the internet, I’ve retained a screenshot here.

Sanjeev Sabhlok

View more posts from this author
7 thoughts on “Modi and Madhuri – more details of the alleged relationship. And no, this is not a father-daughter relationship.
  1. Sureshan

    The girl’s father, however, said in a statement that his daughter, who was based in Bangalore, had come to Ahmedabad when her mother was to undergo a surgery. She was required to commute at odd hours between the hospital and a nearby hotel which was a matter of concern to him.

    He had, therefore, orally requested Modi, “with whom we have long-standing family relations” to “take care” of her. He was shocked that some “vested interests” were approaching the media in this regard.

     
  2. Sanjeev Sabhlok

    Sureshan, I had already noted this point in an earlier blog post. The statement by the father doesn’t hold water, but is also problematic in a serious way.

    1) Let the “girl” say what she has to. The father has no business to tell us HER story since she was NOT a little girl but an independent businesswoman (architect), and has allegedly visited Gujarat not just once but extensively. The petition by Pradeep Sharma in the Supreme court makes that abundantly clear, apart from the FB entry. Let Mansi Soni speak out and clarify the number of times she has visited Gujarat and whether she stayed for two days in Modi’s residence – as alleged by Pradeep Sharma, Also why was her security a problem only during the period when her mother was to undergo surgery? What about the other times?

    2) Just because one knows Modi, is that sufficient reason to expect taxpayer funded POLICE security for your dauguther? When police security has been withdrawn by Modi from Sreekumar, DGP, and reduced for Sanjiv Bhatt – poeple with GENUINE and well-evaluated needs for security, what security assessment was conducted by Modi before giving Mansi Soni security? What process is followed by Modi’s government to provide “secuirty” to private citizens? Recall that Modi failed to provide security to 1000 people who were killed after the Godhra incident. He actively incited these killings. So what makes him provide security to one Indian and not to the residents of Gujarat?

    3) The father is assuming that this was a case of security being provided to his daughter. That is incorrect. This is a case of prying into the privacy of his dauguther. Modi and his forces were SNOOPING on his daughter. There is a HUGE difference between security and spying. This is a case of extra-judicial spying, in which Gujarat police was used by Modi as his private detective agency. Which constitutional power entitles him to use police as his private detective agency? Is the father not bothered that someone with whom he has an old relationship is snooping on his dauguter/ stalking her? What about his daughter’s self-respect and liberty? Why has he not CONDEMNED the spying on his daugther? I condemn it.

    4) The father forgets that Modi has imprisoned a senior IAS officer who had raised some questions regarding this matter. So this is NOT a case of private “security” for his daughter. It is a case of PENAL action being taken by Modi against an (allegedly) honest IAS officer in a matter in which his daughter is involved. This is one more case of the DESTRUCTION of administration, police and justice by Modi.

    The case has raised too many further questions about Modi and his goondas, and their ongoing misuse of a machinery from which the PUBLIC get no protection but he gets to use to expand his private purposes. And his penchant to liquidate/imprison anyone who raises questions.

    Let Mansi Soni – who has been spied by Modi – speak and clarify to India. Let her also explain the petition by Pradeep Sharma. Did she know him. Which parts of the petition are correct, which are wrong?

    I’m surprised that the media has been sitting tight on this issue. What happened to the concept of investigative journalism?

     
  3. B L Gupta

    What is problem? Such ppl are everywhere and in each party. Some doing in India and some go to the oveseas in the name of holidaying. Preparations are on for General Election 2014 by the E.C. Political parties are also preparing themselves with such articles. This is start only, just watch what happens next. Relax! Relax! politics is the dirtiest business in all democracies and politicians are………est persons promoting it.

     
  4. S.E.Huda

    such a person/politician at least does not deserve to become the P.M.should also resign as the C.M.please have some respect and install respectable persons at these prestigious posts.

     
  5. shanthala k

    Yes, I can understand such things, my current life is similar to madhuri’s story. When men who didn’t enjoy their teenage or married life get attracted to a woman, they can stalk and tap phones. My current gang of stalkers are all over 45 plus and are very much interested to know my personal life and have been tapping all my phones since the past two years. They watch my moves and its funny they have people to support such activities.