December 17, 2010
The case against inheritance tax
In DOF I've argued vigorously against James Meade's (a Nobel prize winner in economics) arguments for an inheritance tax. John Rawls took on Meade's arguments to propose a dramatically enhanced welfare state with strong redistribution.
An article in The New York Times today by Russell Roberts (who is a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution and professor of economics at George Mason University) and co-author of Cafe Hayek prompted me to make a comment on the Cafe Hayek blog.
I encourage you to read Russell's argument but note two other key arguments that I've made in DOF. Let me reproduce the entire section:
If you found this post useful, then consider subscribing to my blog by email:
Join the Freedom Team of India or become a Freedom Partner.
This is one of India's most popular blogs.
SUBSCRIBE by email:BEFORE YOU COMMENT ON THIS BLOG:
(1) Please make sure you:
(a) have read the Sone Ki Chidiya Total Reform Agenda; and
(b) are an organ donor.
(2) Be aware that any comment that is abusive or does not add value will be rejected.
- The case against inheritance tax #2
- The challenge of educating prodigies: the case of the Indian child Tanishq Abraham
- Modi must now PROVE all facts against Sreekumar in the ISRO case, else this is a CLEAR case of Modi vendetta
- The case for the progressive tax
- The case against the flat tax
- The Vikram Buddhi case
- Brain drain from India to the West – case study and ongoing research
- Gurcharan Das’s case for a liberal party in India, and how the Freedom Team is working to deliver it
- The Case Against RSS
- Kevin Andrews comes out clean in the Haneef case